Every long-serving government eventually faces the same question: what truly changed because of its leadership, and what would likely have happened anyway as part of the nation’s broader historical trajectory? This question becomes especially relevant when evaluating a government that has remained politically dominant for more than a decade. In a country as vast, youthful, and dynamic as India, economic growth, urban expansion, technological adoption, infrastructure development, and welfare delivery are not products of a single administration alone. They are cumulative outcomes shaped over decades through institutions, earlier reforms, demographic momentum, entrepreneurship, globalization, and continuity in governance. India’s highways would likely have expanded under any reasonably stable government. Airports would have grown. Railways would have modernized. Digital governance and direct benefit transfers were already emerging before 2014. Welfare architecture based on financial inclu...
A few days ago, I received a call from someone who wanted to switch his accounting system to Zoho Books. He scheduled an appointment, and we had a detailed discussion at my office. Toward the end of our meeting, he suddenly asked, “Is this your initial? Are you from this place?” I replied, “Yes,” a bit surprised. That’s when he smiled and said, “You were the first person to enroll in my computer institute back in the 1990s!” I was stunned. After almost 30 years, he still remembered! And as soon as he mentioned it, I recalled his face and name—I had felt a sense of familiarity when we met, but I had brushed it off. What made this moment even more special was the role reversal. Decades ago, he had introduced me to computers, shaping my early tech journey. Now, I was guiding him through his Zoho Books implementation, providing training and support. It felt truly fulfilling—almost poetic. He was a visionary—one of the first businessmen in town to implement computerized billing decades...